Politics

SNP row erupts as party refuses to deny Flynn wouldn’t sing National Anthem

A row has damaged out between the Conservatives and the SNP as the Scottish party refused to deny that Stephen Flynn would not sing the National Anthem on Remembrance Sunday.

Stephen Flynn was seen standing in silence as the National Anthem was being sung, triggering outrage from Scottish Conservative deputy chief Meghan Gallagher.


She claimed the SNP’s Westminster chief had “fallen shamefully short”.

She mentioned: “Stephen Flynn is entitled to his republican views, however as Westminster chief of the SNP he has an obligation to present respect to our head of state and to all nations and anthems.

WATCH: Richard Tice’s Sunday Sermon on Remembrance Sunday

“By apparently refusing to join in with the national anthem, especially at a service to honour those who gave their lives for this country, he has fallen shamefully short of this.”

But when these feedback had been put to the SNP, a supply hit again, saying: “Pretty grotesque that the Tories are trying to politicise Remembrance Sunday”.

Refusing to deny claims he wasn’t singing, a spokesperson added: “Stephen Flynn was honoured to characterize the SNP on the Service of Remembrance on the Cenotaph, which is about remembering the sacrifice of all those who have defended our freedoms, together with members of Mr Flynn’s household.

“It is disappointing that the Scottish Conservative Party is searching for to politicise Remembrance Sunday on this method, on a day once we must be united in remembering the service of others.”

As many as 10,000 veterans and armed forces personnel took half within the ceremony, which was additionally attended by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Labour chief Sir Keir Starmer.

Remembrance weekend was certain up in controversy and unrest as each pro-Palestine and right-wing protesters descended on London.

Police had been pressured to use batons to hit again protesters as they breached police traces, whereas a whole lot of screaming Britons had been heard chanting “England ’til I die”.

A variety of arrests had been made and several other members of the police had been left injured.

This got here simply someday after Suella Braverman penned an Op-Ed within the Times, accusing the Met Police for “enjoying favourites” when it comes to the policing of protests.

She mentioned the pro-Palestinian marches are “problematic” because of “violence across the fringes”, in addition to “extremely offensive” chants, posters and stickers.

Some blamed Braverman for the weekend’s violence, claiming the remarks have stoked up tensions in Britain.

Baroness Warsi, a Conservative peer, mentioned the Home Secretary “had lit the contact paper and ignited neighborhood tensions” together with her remarks.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

She advised the Evening Standard: “Couching the deliberate demonstration as ‘armistice day vs a hate march,’ she has pitched neighborhood in opposition to neighborhood and set a loud name for peace in opposition to a quiet second of reflection to mark the warfare.”

But Tory MP Brendan Clarke-Smith dismissed these blaming Braverman for the disruption as “daft”, adding: “These protests have been happening for weeks and this conflict with Armistice Day had been scheduled for some time. If something it exhibits she was proper.”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button