The father or mother firm of Sky Bet and Paddy Power has warned racing should embrace main change because it has develop into “unprofitable” for bookmakers, with a shrinking viewers and the game’s “underlying quality” in decline.
Writing in the Racing Post amid a media rights row with racecourse group Arena Racing Company, Ian Brown, chief government of Flutter Entertainment’s UK and Ireland division, additionally questions prize-money ranges and requested the place its funds to racecourses have been going.
The feedback come the week after Flutter’s newest try and put strain on ARC to return to the negotiating desk over the media rights contract between the 2 sides. Last week, Paddy Power and Sky Bet didn’t provide early costs for a gathering on the ARC-owned Chepstow, as a substitute providing odds solely in the minutes earlier than every race was scheduled.
That adopted comparable motion in the beginning of the month for a card at Chepstow’s stablemate Bath. On that event the 2 bookmakers had not been resulting from provide any costs for the assembly however in the end guess on the contests simply earlier than the off following a authorized intervention by ARC.
Sign up for BloodHorse Daily
In his opinion piece, Brown mentioned bookmakers and British racing had “some serious shared challenges.”
He added: “Our data shows how declining prize-money leads to declining field sizes, making the product for customers less compelling. This, in turn, leads to lower betting revenues, and so less revenue for the sport. It is a clear and concerning spiral.”
Bookmakers contribute round £350 million ($451.5 million) to British racing’s funds yearly via media rights funds, the levy, and sponsorship. However, Brown warned the game that his agency was paying extra for a declining product and mentioned the connection between media rights funds and prize-money has develop into more and more distant.
He added: “Our information means that the incremental worth prospects place on sure fixtures is way decrease than what it prices us simply to stream these races. Indeed, what we pay as only one bookmaker is usually near the entire prize-money on provide.
“We estimate that total streaming income is round 3 times the prize-money for conferences like Bath and Chepstow—and that is additionally earlier than the levy contribution—which makes us surprise the place the remainder of the cash goes.
“Yet there’s a bigger, more fundamental issue here. We, as Flutter, simply cannot afford to keep investing in horse racing as an unprofitable product with a shrinking audience, where media costs are escalating at significant rates, and the underlying quality of the product is declining.”
Brown praised the willingness of the game to strive new issues, saying Premier race days have been outperforming different fixtures, however known as on racing to think about going “further and faster” with that initiative whereas additionally exploring different choices to innovate and experiment.
The media rights contract between Arc and Flutter runs till 2027. While agreements are non-public, Flutter beforehand claimed complete media rights funds from bookmakers to racecourses have been greater than twice the levy, which stood at £105 million in the latest scheme. Media rights offers usually contain an operator paying a share of betting turnover to racecourses for rights to hold reside streaming in betting outlets and on-line.
