Leo Varadkar says he has a right to want a united Ireland
- By Brendan Hughes
- BBC News NI political reporter
The taoiseach (Irish prime minister) has described the UK authorities’s criticism of his feedback about a united Ireland as a “double standard”.
Leo Varadkar mentioned final week he believed he would see a united Ireland in his lifetime.
Mr Heaton-Harris mentioned he wanted the “clearest pitch possible” in efforts to restore Stormont’s devolved authorities.
The establishments collapsed final 12 months when the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) withdrew in protest in opposition to post-Brexit commerce obstacles between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
The DUP has mentioned the Windsor Framework deal – struck by the UK authorities and European Union this 12 months to tackle considerations with the Northern Ireland Protocol – doesn’t go far sufficient.
It has been in talks with the federal government to search additional legislative assurances of Northern Ireland’s place inside the UK inner market.
Mr Varadkar mentioned Prime Minister Rishi Sunak describes himself as a “proud unionist” and others within the UK authorities typically discuss their dedication to the union.
“Not only do we accept that, we respect it,” he informed RTÉ.
“Why is there a double standard applied to Irish politicians when we say what’s in our constitution, that we’d like to see a united Ireland and work towards it?”
Referencing the Northern Ireland secretary’s remarks, Mr Varadkar mentioned the Irish authorities has been “extremely helpful to the British government since the Brexit journey began”.
In response, the Northern Ireland Office mentioned beneath the Good Friday Agreement, “Northern Ireland will remain part of the UK for as long as its people wish for it to be”.
A spokesman mentioned: “We are absolutely clear that there is no basis to suggest that a majority of people in Northern Ireland wish to separate from the United Kingdom.”
He mentioned that beneath his management as taoiseach they negotiated a number of agreements with the UK authorities together with the Northern Ireland Protocol.
“When they couldn’t honour that agreement, we were the adults in the room, and we negotiated the Windsor framework,” he added.
Mr Varadkar additionally reiterated his name for discussions about “alternative arrangements” if Stormont isn’t restored.
“There does come a point where these talks between the UK government and the DUP can’t be ongoing forever and can’t exclude others forever,” he mentioned.
“And we do need to sit down at some point and talk about what alternative arrangements can be put in place within the confines of the Good Friday Agreement.”
‘Fundamental considerations’
But DUP MP Ian Paisley mentioned he doesn’t imagine there shall be a restoration of the Stormont establishments this 12 months.
Meanwhile, responding to Mr Varadkar’s feedback, DUP deputy chief Gavin Robinson urged the Irish prime minister to “dial down his border poll rhetoric” and “spend his time focusing on building better relationships between his country and ours”.
“There is overwhelming support for Northern Ireland remaining an integral part of the United Kingdom,” he added.
“Leo Varadkar is playing domestic politics in his own country and must know that a border poll is the last thing Northern Ireland needs, that such a campaign would take the focus off the issues that need advanced and in the end having further harmed relationships would be defeated.”
Sinn Féin vice-president Michelle O’Neill referred to as for the Stormont govt and meeting to be restored “so that we can push on and get back to business”.
“Everyone has been more than reasonable in giving space and time, but there must be a clear limit and public patience is now running out,” she mentioned.
Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) meeting member Matthew O’Toole mentioned the absence of devolved authorities is “creating chaos” in Northern Ireland’s public companies.
He informed the BBC’s Good Morning Ulster programme that among the many public, “anger is passing into contempt and that contempt is passing into indifference”.
“That’s really, really toxic in any democracy,” he added.
“We’re simply creating chaos in our public companies, we’re making it unattainable for choices to be made, they’re build up, they’re stacking up all through the system.
“I do know the constraints of the establishments, the constraints of our constructions and certainly the constraints of a few of my colleagues, however that does not imply we do not want devolved authorities, as a result of when we do not have it, frankly it makes issues worse.”
Independent unionist Claire Sugden added that though the devolved establishments usually are not functioning, meeting members are nonetheless working for his or her constituents.
“I can guarantee you my constituency workplace by no means stops,” she mentioned.