Boris Johnson is dealing with twin allegations of a partygate cover-up, with opposition leaders accusing him of “behaving like a tinpot despot”.

The Liberal Democrats declare studies that Downing Street put strain on Sue Gray to dilute her report reveal an try and cowl up “lies and law-breaking”.

And Labour is to power a Commons vote on a move by the prime minister to re-write the ministerial code, which deputy chief Angela Rayner claims will “give a green light to corruption”.

Responding to a Sunday Times report on the Gray report, Liberal Democrat Chief Whip Wendy Chamberlain MP mentioned: “This seems like one other disgraceful try by Boris Johnson and the Conservatives to cowl up for his or her lies and law-breaking.

“The Privileges Committee should instantly look into the supposed interference into the publication of the Sue Gray report. If the federal government actually did alter the report, the British public needs to be informed the reality.”

In its report, The Sunday Times claims: “Sources, each political and civil service, say Gray was lobbied on Tuesday night to make adjustments by three senior civil servants.

“They urged her to not publish the names of a few of those that had attended the 12 law-breaking events. Other adjustments have been additionally requested to passages within the report that made reference to Carrie Johnson, the prime minister’s spouse.

More on Downing Street Parties

“Gray told them to ‘instruct’ her to make the changes – a move that would have required a senior minister to sign off amendments, signalling publicly that the revisions had been made against her will.”

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

The report says a senior determine in Downing Street claimed that Downing Street chief of workers Steve Barclay was approached and, after discussions with director of communications Guto Harri, refused to problem the instruction, and Cabinet Office minister Michael Ellis would solely perform the request if ordered to take action by Mr Barclay.

“The result of the standoff was that a number of names were removed, because by then the key pressure had already been brought to bear,” the newspaper claims. “Up to 30 people had been contacted by Gray telling them she intended to name them. In the end only 15 people were named in the final report.”

In response to the report, a Cabinet Office spokesperson mentioned: “We did not change the report in terms of substantive content. The key point that we would say about anything [that suggests] previous copy was substantively edited – it was never shared with Number 10 in advance.”

Deputy Labour chief Angela Rayner has accused the PM of giving ‘the inexperienced gentle to corruption’

Labour, in the meantime, has dedicated to utilizing an opposition day within the Commons to debate ministerial requirements after Mr Johnson amended the ministerial code so ministers wouldn’t all the time must resign for breaching it.

Ms Rayner claimed: “Boris Johnson is behaving like a tinpot despot and is trampling all over the ideas of public life.

“Many first rate Conservative MPs are deeply uncomfortable with Johnson’s behaviour they usually now have the possibility to cease his sinister makes an attempt at watering down requirements and integrity in our democracy.

Read extra from Sky News:
Drip feed of no confidence letters in PM as pressure grows after Sue Gray report

Who’s in the firing line after partygate report?

“Serious breaches of the ministerial code should end in resignation, whether or not they’re intentionally deceptive parliament, bullying workers, bribery or sexual assault.

“This prime minister merely can’t be trusted to uphold requirements in authorities whereas his conduct sinks additional into the gutter and he offers the inexperienced gentle to corruption.

“It’s time to stop the rot that this prime minister has created at the heart of government and restore standards in public life.”

Source link