Rwanda bill – live: Rishi Sunak rules out concessions as MPs reject Lords’ amendments

MPs voted 302 to 244, majority 58, to reject Lords’ modification 10D, which might exempt brokers, allies and workers of the UK abroad, such as Afghans who fought alongside the British armed forces, from being eliminated to Rwanda.

It was the fourth modification by friends in a row that MPs rejected.

Ministers ought to give assurances that Afghans who served alongside UK armed forces is not going to be deported to Rwanda, a Conservative former justice secretary has mentioned.

Sir Robert Buckland advised the Commons: “I do assume that there’s nonetheless a category of people that have served this nation, who’ve been courageous and have uncovered themselves to hazard, who haven’t but been handled.

“Many of them are in Pakistan, and I feel that it might have been useful to have maybe seen an modification in lieu to cope with that time, as (the minister) did with modern-day slavery, for which I thank him.”

Sir Robert additionally insisted that checks on guaranteeing Rwanda was a protected nation have been “not a wrecking amendment”.

The Independent has campaigned for Afghan conflict heroes who served alongside British forces to be given refuge within the UK.

MPs voted by 310 to 240, a majority of 70, to reject Lords modification 6D. The modification would restore the jurisdiction of home courts over the security of Rwanda and allow them to intervene.

MPs have voted by 306 to 240, majority 66, to reject Lords modification 3E, which might require that Rwanda can’t be handled as a protected nation till an impartial monitoring physique has verified that protections contained within the treaty are totally carried out and stay in place.

MPs have voted by 306 to 240, a majority of 66, to reject a Lords modification that sought to make sure the Safety of Rwanda Bill had “due regard” for worldwide and key home legal guidelines, together with human rights and fashionable slavery laws.

Downing Street has dominated out making concessions on its Safety of Rwanda Bill as MPs and friends put together for an additional spherical of parliamentary ping pong.

Peers have voted for a 3rd time to amend the laws that can permit asylum-seekers crossing the Channel in small boats to be deported to Rwanda.

The authorities had been reported to be contemplating making some concessions to make sure the Bill’s passage, together with on exemptions for Afghan nationals who assisted British forces.

But the Prime Minister’s official spokesman dominated out any such transfer, telling reporters: “We are not considering concessions. We believe the Bill as it stands is the right Bill and the quickest way to get flights off the ground.”

MPs are due to this fact more likely to reject the Lords’ amendments as soon as once more, earlier than sending the laws again to the Upper House afterward Wednesday.

It will then be as much as friends to resolve whether or not to press their adjustments additional, with Labour saying it might again two amendments proposed by the Lords.

A celebration spokesman mentioned Labour would “continue to take the position that we have so far”, together with by supporting proposals to exempt Afghans who helped UK troops.

There is potential for additional debate on the Bill till late on Wednesday evening as the laws passes between Parliament’s two homes if settlement will not be reached.

Nick Boles, who was an MP for 9 years, slammed the scrutiny over the sale of Ms Rayner’s former council house and whether or not she averted paying the correct tax or had appropriately registered on the proper handle.