The Home Office is planning a second flight to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda, which may take off earlier than the courts have dominated on whether or not the scheme is lawful, the Guardian has discovered.

It is known {that a} second flight may take off in a matter of weeks even if the total excessive court docket listening to to study the federal government’s Rwanda plans doesn’t start till 19 July.

Home Office sources stated they might not touch upon operational issues or hypothesis.

During an earlier excessive court docket listening to, the charities Detention Action and Care4Calais, the PCS union that represents about 80% of Home Office Border Force workers, and a number of particular person asylum seekers threatened with removing to Rwanda unsuccessfully made an pressing utility to the decide to halt the primary flight, which was due to depart on 14 June.

The flight was subsequently grounded after an interim 11th-hourintervention from the European court docket of human rights.

During the court docket listening to, the decide within the case, Mr Justice Swift, requested the Home Office counsel Mathew Gullick QC whether or not the Home Office was planning any additional flights to Rwanda within the close to future.

Gullick replied: “The Home Office intends to make arrangements for further flights this year. There may be a further flight scheduled between now and July. It will require approval from the Rwandan government.”

The organisation Stop Deportations posted a message on social media on 24 June stating: “We have heard that the Home Office has started to detain dozens of people to deport them to Rwanda.”

After the European court docket interim measure grounded the 14 June flight, the house secretary, Priti Patel, stated she was dissatisfied by the authorized problem, criticised the ECHR ruling and stated the coverage would proceed.

“We will not be deterred from doing the right thing and delivering our plans to control our nation’s borders,” she stated. “Our legal team are reviewing every decision made on this flight and preparation for the next flight begins now.”

It is known the Home Office has made submissions to the European court docket to put aside the interim ruling.

When the Guardian requested the European court docket in regards to the process when contemplating such submissions, a spokesperson stated: “An interim measure decision can be reviewed at the request of one of the parties. An interim measure would usually only be lifted if the court was satisfied that there was no imminent risk of irreparable harm to the applicant. That test would normally be satisfied in an expulsion case if either a) there was no imminent risk of expulsion, or b) the court was satisfied that if expelled, there would no longer be a real risk of irreparable harm.”

A Home Office spokesperson stated: “We remain committed to our world-leading migration partnership with Rwanda, which will see those arriving dangerously, illegally or unnecessarily into the UK relocated to rebuild their lives. This is vital to prevent loss of life in the Channel and break the business model of people smugglers. Preparations for the next flight are under way.”

Home Office sources added: “No court docket has truly dominated that this partnership is illegal, and that features the European court of human rights.”

Source link