UK regulator to crack down on electricity generators making ‘excessive profits’

Receive free UK enterprise & financial system updates

We’ll ship you a myFT Daily Digest electronic mail rounding up the most recent UK enterprise & financial system information each morning.

The British vitality regulator has accused energy station house owners of attempting to recreation the system for extra income, because it set out steps to try to clamp down on the observe. 

Ofgem stated on Thursday that an investigation had discovered some generators had withheld provides so as to fetch the next value for them within the back-up market, pushing up prices for shoppers on the height of the vitality disaster.

It launched the probe after the prices of protecting provide and demand matched via the so-called balancing market hit report ranges in November 2021 initially of the vitality disaster, with £60mn spent by community operator National Grid on sooner or later alone.

Ofgem stated these prices in the course of the winter of 2021-22 — when demand is highest — hit £1.5bn, greater than triple the extent of the typical over the previous three winters.

The watchdog stated it could crack down on “various behaviours it had identified among some generators, who have been attempting to gain excessive financial benefit at a cost to consumers”.

It is proposing a brand new licence situation to “ensure electricity generators don’t take advantage of existing rules to make excessive profits”, stated Eleanor Warburton, Ofgem’s appearing director for vitality techniques administration and safety.

The new licence situation, which can prohibit generators’ capacity to revenue and embody monetary penalties for breaches, might be in place in time for winter, Ofgem stated.

The intervention comes after UK chancellor Jeremy Hunt earlier this week stepped up the stress on regulators, together with Ofgem, to do extra to preserve shopper prices down.

Ofgem stated: “We believe it is necessary to intervene to prohibit behaviours that result in generators realising excessive benefits, which are costs ultimately payable by consumers.”

The watchdog didn’t identify the businesses concerned. However, an investigation by Bloomberg earlier this 12 months stated some merchants at companies together with Vitol, Uniper and SSE would inform National Grid they had been shutting down energy vegetation forward of intervals of tight provide solely to begin them up once more as soon as that they had secured larger costs for the facility.

Electricity provide and demand has to be always matched to keep away from blackouts. National Grid smooths out any mismatches, utilizing the “balancing market” to pay generators to swap on or flip off at quick discover. 

Ofgem stated it recognized “repeated instances” of generators telling National Grid they had been going to swap off, after which providing to flip again on at larger costs within the “balancing market”, which the community operator has little selection however to settle for. 

SSE stated it “fully complies” with the foundations. Vitol declined to remark however had beforehand stated its VPI energy enterprise abided by “all relevant regulations and fulfils any commitments to deliver power to the grid”. Uniper didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

Adam Bell, head of coverage at vitality consultancy Stonehaven, stated Ofgem might in principle ask generators to return a few of the extra income earned via the balancing mechanism, but it surely had little enforcement energy past that.

“What they’re alleged to have done was within the letter of the rules, even if not in the spirit of the rules,” he stated.

Darren Jones, Labour chair of the enterprise and commerce choose committee, stated: “This is another example of company executives getting away with immoral profiteering. But as immoral as it is, it isn’t illegal. Ministers will decide if that’s acceptable or not.”

The proposed change to the licence circumstances would restrict the costs generators cost within the balancing mechanism to their prices “plus a reasonable profit”. 

Bell warned that whereas reforms to the market could also be essential there was the chance that Ofgem’s proposals may lead to corporations being much less in a position to supply vitality provides when wanted.

“The people primarily at fault here are clearly the ones that were gaming the system but it’s not a straightforward issue to solve,” Bell stated. “There will almost certainly be some legitimate behaviour that will also be removed by these proposals.”

Energy UK, the commerce group, has beforehand stated there was disagreement amongst generators over whether or not to assist the licence situation, with some issues that it might distort the market and injury funding.

The vitality division stated it welcomed all actions taken to shield shoppers and backed Ofgem in utilizing all of the powers at its disposal to go additional if wanted.