Some numbers are odd:
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 …
Some are even:
2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 …
And then there are the puzzling “eban” numbers:
2, 4, 6, 30, 32, 34, 36, 40 …
What quantity comes subsequent? And why?
These are questions that Neil Sloane, a mathematician of Highland Park, N.J., likes to ask. Dr. Sloane is the founder of the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, a database of 362,765 (and counting) quantity sequences outlined by a exact rule or property. Such as the prime numbers:
2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 …
Or the Fibonacci numbers — each time period (beginning with the third time period) is the sum of the two previous numbers:
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 …
This 12 months the OEIS, which has been praised as “the master index to mathematics” and “a mathematical equivalent to the FBI’s voluminous fingerprint files,” celebrates its 50th anniversary. The unique assortment, “A Handbook of Integer Sequences,” appeared in 1973 and contained 2,372 entries. In 1995, it grew to become an “encyclopedia,” with 5,487 sequences and an extra creator, Simon Plouffe, a mathematician in Quebec. A 12 months later, the assortment had doubled in dimension once more, so Dr. Sloane put it on the web.
“In a sense, every sequence is a puzzle,” Dr. Sloane mentioned in a latest interview. He added that the puzzle facet is incidental to the database’s fundamental objective: to prepare all mathematical data.
Sequences present in the wild — in arithmetic, but additionally quantum physics, genetics, communications, astronomy and elsewhere — may be puzzling for quite a few causes. Looking up these entities in the OEIS, or including them to the database, typically results in enlightenment and discovery.
“It’s a supply of unexpected results,” mentioned Lara Pudwell, a mathematician at Valparaiso University in Indiana and a member of the OEIS Foundation’s board of trustees. Dr. Pudwell writes algorithms to unravel counting issues. A couple of years in the past, thus engaged, she entered into the OEIS search field a sequence that arose whereas learning numerical patterns:
2, 4, 12, 20, 38, 56, 88 …
The solely outcome that popped up pertained to chemistry: particularly, to the periodic desk and the atomic numbers of the alkaline earth metals. “I found this perplexing,” Dr. Pudwell mentioned. She consulted with chemists and shortly “realized there were interesting chemical structures to work with to explain the connection.”
